Diego Fernández de Cevallos, in his March 16, 2026 column “Tragedia y vergüenza” for Milenio, sharply criticized Mexico’s judicial system following a preliminary ruling by the Organization of American States (OAS), which found that the country’s judicial elections fail to meet international standards of independence, impartiality, and transparency.
OAS Findings
- The OAS resolution stated that Mexico’s judicial election process violated international protocols.
- A final ruling is expected to be even harsher, raising concerns about the credibility of Mexico’s judiciary.
- The Mexican government responded by accusing the OAS of infringing on national sovereignty, a reaction Fernández de Cevallos dismissed as evasive.
Criticism of Judicial Leadership
- Fernández de Cevallos described the judiciary as plagued by “grotesque spectacles” involving judges, magistrates, and ministers.
- He singled out the Supreme Court president, questioning his qualifications and mocking initiatives such as holding itinerant court sessions in rural communities.
- The columnist argued that symbolic gestures of humility do not compensate for a lack of competence in managing the country’s highest court.
Controversial Remarks
- The article highlighted comments by Justice María Estela Ríos, who suggested that children conceived through in vitro fertilization might not be considered part of a family.
- Fernández de Cevallos condemned the statement as “abominable” and joined widespread public indignation.
- He compared Ríos unfavorably to other justices, asserting that several lack the ability to even read prepared briefs effectively.
Broader Implications
- The column portrays Mexico’s judiciary as deeply compromised, with appointments based on political loyalty rather than merit.
- Fernández de Cevallos warned that the erosion of judicial independence represents both a national tragedy and a source of shame, undermining the rule of law.
- His critique reflects growing concern among legal experts and international observers about the state of Mexico’s democratic institutions.
The OAS ruling and Fernández de Cevallos’s scathing commentary underscore mounting pressure on Mexico’s judiciary, raising urgent questions about its independence, credibility, and ability to uphold justice.
Source: Milenio
